Smoking Breaks At Work : Non-Smokers are Fuming
|

|
|
Smoke Breaks
|

|
The
issue of smoking breaks, or 'smokos', in the workplace are
beginning to polarise smokers and non-smokers, with many recent
surveys and polls suggesting that non-smokers are not too
happy with their nicotine neighbours.
Here's a scenario: "Cyber Centurion" is an online
security firm with 24 employees. Of these two dozen workers,
10 are smokers, and of these smokers almost all take four
breaks per day to go and have a 'smoko', each break no shorter
than 15 minutes.
All up, each of these 10 workers is spending an hour per
working day - on top of their lunchbreaks - to smoke, and
the 14 other non-smokers are starting to get envious, seeing
as they are technically working five hours extra per week
than their cigi-smoking co-workers.
And while there are always two sides to the story, recruitment
firm Kelly Services' recently completed a survey, where some
2,000 Australian workers were quizzed on the issue of smoking
breaks and productivity, and it seems that the majority of
non-smokers weren't too pleased.
The data from the survey says that 11 per cent of the 2,000
workers said that they take a 'smoko' during their work day
and that just three per cent of this group smoked more than
six cigarettes per day, while more than 90 per cent went outside
to puff between one and three times a day.
This didn't sit well with the other 89 per cent of people
surveyed who didn't smoke during the work day, with more than
half of this non-smoking group feeling that 'smokos' resulted
in reduced productivity.
The evidence is there, and there is a definite animosity
between the two groups. On one side, smokers will tell you
that by having a break away from their duties, it refreshes
them and allows to hit the ground running.
On the other side of the equation, non-smokers will dispute
this, arguing instead in regards to the accumulated time wasting
that occurs with 'smokos'.
While there are merits to both sides of the arguament, one
thing is for certain - the issue won't be going up in smoke
any time soon.
There could be way to appease both groups,
such as a reduced lunch break for those who take multiple
'smokos' or the introduction of specific non-smoker breaks
to even the playing field.
But at the end of the day, the issue faces so many varying
factors, such as work hours, environment and work duties,
which would make creating an overriding set of rules for everyone
very difficult indeed.
Maybe there really is no simple solution to the growing resentment
that non-smokers have for their cigarette-smoking co-workers
and, like tax, is perhaps one of those things that 'just is'
and should be accepted?
Want To Quit Smoking? Visit www.quit.org.au
|