Web Wombat - the original Australian search engine
 
You are here: Home / Entertainment / DVDs / Reviews / Next
Entertainment Menu
Business Links
Premium Links
Web Wombat Search
Advanced Search
Submit a Site
 
Search 30 million+ Australian web pages:
Try out our new Web Wombat advanced search (click here)
DVDs
Humour
Movies
TV
Books
Music
Theatre

Next

Buy Now
Review by Toby Hillard

In Next, Nicolas Cage's character has the ability to see two minutes into the future.

Couldn't he have done everyone a favour, tried a little harder and looked two hours into the future... and never made the movie in the first place?

Next

Next is junk. Flat out, no questions asked, "Would you like me to throw that out with last nights scraps" junk!

Could it be Nicolas Cage? Could it be Jessica Biel's complete inability to act? Could it be the woeful script and dialouge? Or what about the CGI which looks like it was made using a Super Nintendo? There are simply to many questions that need to be answered - the major one being: How stupid do the folks who actually forked over cash to see Next (and there weren't too many, the flick made only $18M in the USA, and $31M worldwide) feel for actually wasting their hard earned on this junk?

The even more depressing thing is that Next is actually a pretty cool concept for a flick, which makes it so upsetting that the creators got it so very wrong.

Based on the the Phillip K Dick short story "The Golden Man" (Hollywood has really been unkind to Dick, with A Scanner Darkly and Blade Runner being the only of his stories which haven't been cinematically raped), Next stars Nicolas "At Least I Believe This Is My Real Hair & That's All That Really Matters" Cage as Cris Johnson, a man with the ability to see two minutes into the future.

Sick of the examinations he underwent as a child and the interest in his powers by the government, Johnson lies low as a Las Vegas magician, performing cheap tricks and living off small-time gambling winnings (yep, it seems he has a concious about cheating at cards!). But when a terrorist group threatens to detonate a nuclear device in Los Angeles, government agent Callie Ferris (Moore) must use all her skills to capture Cris and convince him to help her stop the catastrophe.

Now, Cage I can understand signing onto this. The guy has put his name on more turkey's than Steggles - but Julianne Moore? Come on! The lady is actually capable of a decent performance, but it's become quite apparent in the last few years that she's more than willing to take a few credibility blows in favour of a paycheck (The Forgotten, Hannibal). And here, she almost seems embarrassed to be spurting out the dialouge (which may very well have been written by the coked up six-year-old daughter of the Gaffer) - as she should be.

There's just too many problems to deal with here. Once you finally get past the weirdness of Cage's genetically modified face, you soon begin to realise that there is about as much chemistry between Cage & Beil as there is between a Catholic Priest and anyone over the age of five.

It really is that creepy.

Cage just stares at her (it's either that, or he is actually just having trouble moving his facial muscles after all the Boxtox) and occasionally spurts some random facts (I don't know about you, but the last time anyone hooked up with a stranger by simply quoting facts off the top of Carlton Draught caps...well, that's never happened!). As for Beil, while I'm not completley familiar with any of her other work, I know she is certainly capable of more than what she offers here (besides a hot bod, of course. Sizzling!). But in terms of artistic ability - I've seen better auditions for Neighbours.

People certainly won't rent this out with high expectations - let's face it - it's become increasingly apparent that there's a large audience out there that literally has no issue with forking out for Cage's junk (Ghost Rider, National Treasure). And on the same token, I must point out, that I have no issue with "Bad Movies". There are plenty of flicks which are "Guilty Pleasures" (Batman Forever), "So Bad They're Good" (Commando), "Cheesy But Likeable" (Love Actually) - but Cage really is delivering some under developed junk, even by popcorn movie standards. (Ghost Rider and Windtalkers are the only films I've ever stopped watching and felt cheated of my time...Next is next in line).

I wish there were some positives to take out this experience (the second last sequence is pretty interesting), but Next really is just a really cool idea with no additional thoughts put into it. Use some foresight, and avoid at all costs...

EXTRAS

Even the extras are shite! And again, I don't mean that there's not enough included or it's cheaps - it's all just been executed so terribly.

There are several featurettes tacked on here, which are worth the DVD purchase price alone - if only to see how moronic Nicolas Cage really is. Seriously, the guy comes off as a complete brain-dead fool (the Mike Moore of the movie world).

Keep an eye out for how impressed Cage is with his own "ideas" which he's contributed to the film, as well as the phrase "I've always wanted to be a magician - it wasn't in the script - but I really liked that idea" delivered in a way that almost suggests that Cage can't believe someone wouldn't put in such a stupid character trait into the script in the first place.

There's also a fun little drinking game to be had with your mates: take a shot every time anyone on screen tries to include the phrase "Supernatural", "Action", "Paranormal" or "Romance" into their interviews.

It makes me angry even thinking about it!! Let us never speak of Next again!

Conclusion: Movie 5% Extras: 10%

Buy Now

Shopping for...
Visit The Mall

Promotion

Home | About Us | Advertise | Submit Site | Contact Us | Privacy | Terms of Use | Hot Links | OnlineNewspapers | Add Search to Your Site

Copyright © 1995-2012 WebWombat Pty Ltd. All rights reserved